主页 > 运维运营 > ORACLE >
发布时间:2015-09-27 作者:网络 阅读:210次
原来的语句是这样的:

  select sum(sl0000) from xstfxps2 where
  dhao00 in (
  select dhao00 from xstfxps1 where trunc(ywrq00)=trunc(sysdate)
  and khdm00='500000003913');
  已用时间: 00: 02: 49.04
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
  1 0 SORT (AGGREGATE)
  2 1 NESTED LOOPS
  3 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'XSTFXPS2'
  4 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XSTFXPS1'
  5 4 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'XSTFXPS1_PK' (UNIQUE)
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 recursive calls
  0 db block gets
  17355138 consistent gets
  34141 physical reads
  2912 redo size
  198 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
  275 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
  2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
  0 sorts (memory)
  0 sorts (disk)
  1 rows processed
  我们看到统计信息里面进行了17355138次逻辑读,34141次物理IO,这是相当吓人的数字。在执行计划里面我们看到表XSTFXPS2来了一次全表扫描。
  我们首先看一下这两张表总的数据量:
  SQL> select count(*) from xstfxps2;
  
  COUNT(*)
  ----------
  5585018
  我们这里看到XSTFXPS2这张表有5585018条记录。
  SQL> select count(*) from xstfxps1;
  
  COUNT(*)
  ----------
  702121
  两张表的表结构如下所示:
  SQL> desc xstfxps1
  Name Type Nullable Default Comments
  ------ ------------ -------- ------- --------
  DHAO00 NUMBER(8)
  LHDH00 NUMBER(8) Y
  FLDH00 NUMBER(8) Y
  FPLB00 VARCHAR2(2) Y
  YWRQ00 DATE Y
  YWRY00 VARCHAR2(8) Y
  SHRQ00 DATE Y
  XSQRRQ DATE Y
  XSQRRY VARCHAR2(8) Y
  KHDM00 VARCHAR2(12)
  XKZH00 VARCHAR2(12)
  CKDM00 VARCHAR2(2) Y
  THCKDM VARCHAR2(2) Y
  XSFSDM VARCHAR2(2) Y
  FXRYDM VARCHAR2(4) Y
  SHRYDM VARCHAR2(4) Y
  SHBJ00 VARCHAR2(1) 'N'
  FXBJ00 VARCHAR2(1) 'N'
  SKBJ00 VARCHAR2(2) Y
  FKDM00 VARCHAR2(2) Y
  
  SQL> desc xstfxps2
  Name Type Nullable Default Comments
  ------ ------------ -------- ------- --------
  DHAO00 NUMBER(8)
  SPDM00 VARCHAR2(8)
  DJIA00 NUMBER(7,2) 0
  FXSL00 NUMBER Y 0
  SL0000 NUMBER Y 0
  THSL00 NUMBER Y 0
  JE0000 NUMBER Y 0
  SE0000 NUMBER Y
  FPBBH0 VARCHAR2(11) Y
  FPHAO0 VARCHAR2(10) Y
  RBDH00 NUMBER(8) Y
  
  其中XSTFXPS1的客户订单的表头,保存订单的客户信息、订货日期等信息。XSTFXPS2是订单的表体,详细记录了客户订单的商品、价格、数量等信息。
  
  调整的第一步是把子查询提取出来,再看语句的执行计划。通常来说,如果语句能够避免子查询的使用,就尽量不用子查询。因为子查询的开销是相当昂贵的。改写后的语句如下:
  select sum(sl0000)
  from xstfxps2 a,(select dhao00 from xstfxps1 where trunc(ywrq00)=trunc(sysdate)
  and khdm00='500000003913') b
  where a.dhao00=b.dhao00;
  已用时间: 00: 00: 03.05
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
  1 0 SORT (AGGREGATE)
  2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XSTFXPS2'
  3 2 NESTED LOOPS
  4 3 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'XSTFXPS1'
  5 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'XSTFXPS2_PK' (UNIQUE)
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 recursive calls
  0 db block gets
  11974 consistent gets
  225 physical reads
  832 redo size
  211 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
  275 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
  2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
  0 sorts (memory)
  0 sorts (disk)
  1 rows processed
  
  我们可以看到逻辑IO由原来的17355138次下降到11974次,有了数量级的提升。执行时间也有原来将近3分钟下降到现在的3秒多一些。很显然性能有了大幅的提升。不过我们看到执行计划里面表XSTFXPS1还是有一个全表扫描存在。通常来说我们应该尽量避免全表扫描的存在,尤其对于大表,应该建立合适的索引以避免FTS的产生。我们来看这两张表的索引信息:
  
  select index_name,column_name from dba_ind_columns where table_name like 'XSTFXPS%'
  INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME
  ------------------------------ -----------------------------------
  XSTFXPS1_PK DHAO00
  XSTFXPS2_PK DHAO00
  XSTFXPS2_PK SPDM00
  
  我们看到这两张表除了主键约束外都没有建另外的索引。根据语句的查询情况,我们建立了如下的复合索引:
  create index idx_xstfxps1_khdm00_ywrq00 on xstfxps1(khdm00,ywrq00) tablespace indx;
  
  为了使用索引,我们必须对原来的日期字段的条件进行一些调整。因为有个trunc()函数的存在,语句将不会使用到索引。我们只要明白trunc(ywrq00)=trunc(sysdate)事实上等同于ywrq00大于trunc(sysdate),小于trunc(sysdate+1)减去一秒,我们就有了比较好的办法来处理
  这个条件。最终改写后的语句如下:
  select sum(sl0000)
  from xstfxps2 a, xstfxps1 b
  where a.dhao00=b.dhao00
  and b.khdm00='500000003913'
  and b.ywrq00 between trunc(sysdate)
  and trunc(sysdate)+1-1/(24*60*60);
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
  1 0 SORT (AGGREGATE)
  2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XSTFXPS2'
  3 2 NESTED LOOPS
  4 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XSTFXPS1'
  5 4 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_XSTFXPS1_KHDM00_YWRQ00'
  (NON-UNIQUE)
  
  6 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'XSTFXPS2_PK' (UNIQUE)
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0 recursive calls
  0 db block gets
  3 consistent gets
  0 physical reads
  0 redo size
  210 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
  275 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
  2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
  0 sorts (memory)
  0 sorts (disk)
  1 rows processed
  我们这时候看逻辑IO已经降为3次,语句的执行计划也符合我们的调整目标,创建的索引产生了比较大的效果。这条语句的调整至此告一段落。
关键字词: